I started this blog back on July 20, 2009, vowing to write at least one item per day on the 2010 World Cup until kickoff, on June 11, 2010.
Finally, we are here.
This may not have been the first daily "countdown" blog, but it was among the earliest.
At the start, it was difficult to get much World Cup-focused information because the club scene dominates the media in most countries. Even in South Africa, host to the 2010 World Cup, coverage of the event was a bit thin, early.
I owe a debt to the Johannesburg Times, which early on struck me as the most complete and balanced daily news source in the country; rarely did I go two days without poking around their homepage, and I linked to them hundreds of times. Well done, Joburg Times.
I also owe my daughter, Drew, credit for coming up with the idea -- as well as the colorful, five-digit countdown logo at the top of the page.
It was difficult, early on, to find Cup-oriented items during lulls in qualifying, and I did more than a few entries about the nature of South Africa. The infrastructure, the society, etc. ... topics I didn't think I would spent much time on. It clearly is a very complex, very interesting and perhaps a bit frightening society. It could have great things ahead of it. Or not. Perhaps this World Cup will be a harbinger. For good or ill.
As the countdown ticker has moved toward 0:00 ... coverage of the event has rocketed around the world. For the past month, this blog has been just one of many, many voices.
But we got through to the end. No major injuries or illness to keep us from keepin' on. Thankfully. And I posted items to this blog from Paris, Abu Dhabi, Long Beach and four cities in Italy. Today's comes from the little town of Vietri, on the Amalfi Coast.
This is item No. 341 in the 325 days of this blog's existence. It also will be the last, unless I have some huge change in attitude about taking a "countdown" blog past Zero Hour.
Even if it didn't always read like it, this blog took considerable time and energy. Certainly, more than I anticipated. And I am happy to set down this burden. For more World Cup coverage, check my regular blog over at oberjuerge.com
On the final day of countdownsa-2010 ... my predictions for the knockout rounds, through the championship match on July 11.
Thanks for reading, and on to the picks!
Round of 16:
France 1, Greece 0
Germany 2, England 2 (PK 4-3)
Netherlands 3, Paraguay 1
Brazil 3, Chile 1
Argentina 3, Mexico 2
United States 2, Serbia 1
Italy 1, Cameroon 0
Spain 3, Portugal 2
My thoughts: All the knockout-phase matchups are big, but the biggest in terms of global soccer is Germany and England colliding this early ... because I have Germany finishing second in Group D. Germany is something of a nightmare for England, and so are penalties, and I see those two factors conspiring to knock out England earlier than just about anyone expected. One of England's key players ... Frank Lampard, I believe it was ... conceded that penalties have become an issue of mental distress for England. And that is how I see them going out, after a spirited match with the always cool and collected Germans. ... France over Greece. Sure. Greece defends wonderfully, but Les Bleus will find a way to score and Greece will not. ... The Dutch will have little trouble with Paraguay and Brazil will rock Chile, turning up the effort with the final in sight. ... I see Argentina over Mexico in a vastly entertaining match. Lionel Messi perhaps doing enough to keep Diego "El Jefe Loco" Maradona's team in it. ... The big surprise here is the United States stunning Serbia 2-1. Serbia will get caught looking ahead a bit against the unfancied Yanks, who will just be hitting their stride after recovering from the tourney-opening defeat vs. England. ... Italy will do what Italy does, squeezing the life out of Cameroon, the only African national (from six) to survive group play. (And yes, for long-time readers of this blog; I have changed my mind on that contention that an African team would make the semis. I might have been able to see Ivory Coast in the semis, but that was before Didier Drogba was injured.) ... And Spain over Portugal will be great fun, as well. Lots of attacking.
Quarterfinals:
Germany 2, France 0
Brazil 4, Netherlands 2
United States 2, Argentina 1
Italy 1, Spain 0
My thoughts: One major surprise here, one smaller one. The major surprise is the U.S. taking down Argentina. This is about the Americans, yes, but it also is about El Jefe Loco, who is going to cost the Argentines the World Cup ... and this is when it El Diego costs his team. Whether it is some idiotic lineup (benching Lionel Messi, for example), or ridiculous substitutions, or getting red-carded, or (most likely) tactical stupidity that allows a team with a fraction of Argentina's talent to pull off the upset. ... Italy over Spain is an upset in the sense of Spain's three-year run of dominance (only one defeat) , but Italy is the defending champion and a semifinals regular, so it's not exactly a global shock. The Azzurri always are well-organized in the back, and I see them frustrating a Spanish team that never got really comfortable on offense -- and certainly had not seen a defense like that of Italy in getting to the Final Eight. ... Germany over France is no great surprise. Any team led by Raymond Domenech (that would be France) is lucky to have made the final eight. ... The match that produces the most excitement will be Brazil over the Netherlands, where goals will come fast and furious. The Dutch are not afraid to go forward against Brazil, and will penetrate to the goal -- but will be stung by counterattacks and will give up a late goal to make the game look a little less even than it was.
Semifinals:
Brazil 2, Germany 1
Italy 2, United States 0
My thoughts: As expected, really. Germany shows grit and organization, but Brazil has just too much offense. Italy has been out this late plenty of times. The United States hasn't. And the Yanks play poorly on a big stage, never coming close to scoring after the best showing in the country's history.
Championship:
Brazil 2, Italy 1
My thoughts: Brazil still has great talent, but under the stern and clever Carlos Caetano Bledorn Verri -- ridiculously known as "Dunga" (dopey) -- will demonstrate that his nickname has far outlived its usefulness. Under Dunga, Brazil can defend, as well attack. The South Americans will score early, and Italy will come out of its shell, allowing Brazil to get forward for a 2-0 lead. Italy gets a late coach with everyone thrown forward but will not be able to get even. ... Brazil is champion of the world for an unprecedented sixth time, and Europe's inability to win outside its home continent (about to be 0-9 all-time) continues.
Game 1 kickoff in ... about 90 minutes. Good luck to your team!
Read more!
Friday, June 11, 2010
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Predictions! Groups G and H
So far, we have two sides (England and Italy) blowing through group play unbeaten. We have five (!) not scoring a point (Algeria, Australia, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea).
And we have Europe up to its old tricks in dominating play. Seven of the 12 teams we have identified for the second round hail from Europe, with two from North America, two from South America and just one from Africa.
Today we look at groups G and H to see if any of the trends change.
Group G:
Portugal 2, Ivory Coast 1; Brazil 4, North Korea 0.
Brazil 3, Ivory Coast 2; Portugal 3, North Korea 0.
Ivory Coast 2, North Korea 0; Brazil 1, Portugal 1.
Standings: Brazil 7 points (plus-5 goal differential), Portugal 7 (plus-4), Ivory Coast 3 (plus-o), North Korea 0 (minus-9).
My thoughts: This is the so-called Group of Death (every World Cup has to have one; it's a Fifa rule), but the group looks a bit less deadly with Ivorian superstar striker Didier Drogba apparently out with a broken elbow. The key match is Portugal vs. Ivory Coast in Game 1. Whoever wins is going to the Round of 16, and we like Cristiano Ronaldo and the lads over the Drogba-less Elephants. Brazil also will take care of Ivory Coast in a game with far more goals than no-nonsense coach Carlos Caetano Bledorn Verri (Dunga) would like to see put up and, later, with a second-round berth secured, will coast a bit in the match in a draw with the Portuguese -- but still win the group via goal differential. ... Ivory Coast will complete North Korea's utterly miserable World Cup by chalking up the third decisive victory over the Boys from Pyongyang. If it is true that North Korea never televises its team in matches it doesn't win ... well, there won't be anything to watch back home. North Korea was already in trouble, and that was before its national association listed one of its best attacking players as a goalkeeper -- the only position he will be allowed to play. Oops. Good thing North Korea has such a chilled-out government.
Group H:
Chile 2, Honduras 0; Spain 1, Switzerland 1.
Chile 2, Switzerland 1; Spain 2, Honduras 1.
Spain 3, Chile 1; Switzerland 1, Honduras 1.
Standings: Spain 7 points (plus-3), Chile 6 (plus-1), Switzerland 2 (minus-1), Honduras 1 (minus-3).
My thoughts: Spain hasn't been particularly sharp, despite its standing as co-favorite with Brazil, and with striker Fernando Torres not at full speed will be stunned by the on-the-rise Swiss in the opener. But then Del Bosque's crew will get it together, and his stars will shine, with Spain taking the group on the last day of group pay by defeating Chile. ... Chile, however, will have clinched a berth by then by taking care of business against the two lesser teams in the group. ... Switzerland's highlight will be its first-game stunner, but failing to defeat Honduras will doom it to an early exit. ... Little Honduras has had some good moments in the past year, but it has not looked good of late and Wilson Palacios apparently will miss the tournament. Read more!
And we have Europe up to its old tricks in dominating play. Seven of the 12 teams we have identified for the second round hail from Europe, with two from North America, two from South America and just one from Africa.
Today we look at groups G and H to see if any of the trends change.
Group G:
Portugal 2, Ivory Coast 1; Brazil 4, North Korea 0.
Brazil 3, Ivory Coast 2; Portugal 3, North Korea 0.
Ivory Coast 2, North Korea 0; Brazil 1, Portugal 1.
Standings: Brazil 7 points (plus-5 goal differential), Portugal 7 (plus-4), Ivory Coast 3 (plus-o), North Korea 0 (minus-9).
My thoughts: This is the so-called Group of Death (every World Cup has to have one; it's a Fifa rule), but the group looks a bit less deadly with Ivorian superstar striker Didier Drogba apparently out with a broken elbow. The key match is Portugal vs. Ivory Coast in Game 1. Whoever wins is going to the Round of 16, and we like Cristiano Ronaldo and the lads over the Drogba-less Elephants. Brazil also will take care of Ivory Coast in a game with far more goals than no-nonsense coach Carlos Caetano Bledorn Verri (Dunga) would like to see put up and, later, with a second-round berth secured, will coast a bit in the match in a draw with the Portuguese -- but still win the group via goal differential. ... Ivory Coast will complete North Korea's utterly miserable World Cup by chalking up the third decisive victory over the Boys from Pyongyang. If it is true that North Korea never televises its team in matches it doesn't win ... well, there won't be anything to watch back home. North Korea was already in trouble, and that was before its national association listed one of its best attacking players as a goalkeeper -- the only position he will be allowed to play. Oops. Good thing North Korea has such a chilled-out government.
Group H:
Chile 2, Honduras 0; Spain 1, Switzerland 1.
Chile 2, Switzerland 1; Spain 2, Honduras 1.
Spain 3, Chile 1; Switzerland 1, Honduras 1.
Standings: Spain 7 points (plus-3), Chile 6 (plus-1), Switzerland 2 (minus-1), Honduras 1 (minus-3).
My thoughts: Spain hasn't been particularly sharp, despite its standing as co-favorite with Brazil, and with striker Fernando Torres not at full speed will be stunned by the on-the-rise Swiss in the opener. But then Del Bosque's crew will get it together, and his stars will shine, with Spain taking the group on the last day of group pay by defeating Chile. ... Chile, however, will have clinched a berth by then by taking care of business against the two lesser teams in the group. ... Switzerland's highlight will be its first-game stunner, but failing to defeat Honduras will doom it to an early exit. ... Little Honduras has had some good moments in the past year, but it has not looked good of late and Wilson Palacios apparently will miss the tournament. Read more!
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Predictions! For Groups E and F
On to the back half of the group-play matchups.
So far, we have no African or Asian teams advancing. We have one team winning its first three matches: England. And we have three failing to gain a point: Algeria, Australia and South Korea.
Any more extremes coming up? Take a look and see.
Group E:
Netherlands 3, Denmark 1; Cameroon 2, Japan 0.
Netherlands 2, Japan 0; Cameroon 3, Denmark 2.
Denmark 1, Japan 0; Netherlands 3, Cameroon 2.
Standings: Netherlands 9 points (plus-5 differential), Cameroon 6 (plus-2), Denmark 3 (minus-2), Japan 0 (minus-5).
My thoughts: The Netherlands is the class here, a team with panache and scorers galore, even with Arjen Robben out. Robin Van Persie, Dirk Kuyt, Klaas Jan Huntelaar, et al, should score enough to make up for the typical Dutch insistence on going forward, which inevitably yields some counter-attack goals by the opposition. ... Cameroon as the second team out of this group (and first African team to advance) isn't difficult, either. The Indomitable Lions, led by Samuel Eto'o, will have a chance to win the group, but we see the Dutch outscoring them in a madly entertaining third game. ... Denmark is fairly solid, but the other two have too much firepower, and Japan is just overmatched here. Coach Takeshi Okada will be roundly derided for his prediction of a semifinal berth, and fired before Japan gets on the plane home with not only no points ... but no goals.
Group F:
Italy 1, Paraguay 0; Slovakia 2, New Zealand 0.
Paraguay 2, Slovakia 0; Italy 2, New Zealand 0.
Italy 1, Slovakia 0; Paraguay 2, New Zealand 1.
Standings: Italy 9 points (plus-4 differential), Paraguay 6 (plus-2), Slovakia 3 (minus-1), New Zealand 0 (minus-5).
My thoughts: Italy landed in the weakest group of the tournament and may not even break a sweat while playing its usual conservative style -- packing it in on defense and coming forward just enough to get the goal or two it needs to win. If you're betting on the "one team most likely to make the second round," Italy is as good a choice as anyone. Yes, including Spain and Brazil. ... The Paraguay-Slovakia game is the pivotal in determining who gets out of the group. We think the underrated South Americans, led by Roque Santa Cruz and Oscar Cardoza, will not be deterred by their opening defeat against Italy and will bounce back to handle Slovakia, which hasn't played well in about a year and won't last long in its first World Cup appearance. ... But we like the Slovaks to handle semi-professional New Zealand, the weakest side in the tournament. Yes, weaker even than Japan, even though we see the Kiwis scrounging up a goal in the "means nothing" match with the Slovaks. Read more!
So far, we have no African or Asian teams advancing. We have one team winning its first three matches: England. And we have three failing to gain a point: Algeria, Australia and South Korea.
Any more extremes coming up? Take a look and see.
Group E:
Netherlands 3, Denmark 1; Cameroon 2, Japan 0.
Netherlands 2, Japan 0; Cameroon 3, Denmark 2.
Denmark 1, Japan 0; Netherlands 3, Cameroon 2.
Standings: Netherlands 9 points (plus-5 differential), Cameroon 6 (plus-2), Denmark 3 (minus-2), Japan 0 (minus-5).
My thoughts: The Netherlands is the class here, a team with panache and scorers galore, even with Arjen Robben out. Robin Van Persie, Dirk Kuyt, Klaas Jan Huntelaar, et al, should score enough to make up for the typical Dutch insistence on going forward, which inevitably yields some counter-attack goals by the opposition. ... Cameroon as the second team out of this group (and first African team to advance) isn't difficult, either. The Indomitable Lions, led by Samuel Eto'o, will have a chance to win the group, but we see the Dutch outscoring them in a madly entertaining third game. ... Denmark is fairly solid, but the other two have too much firepower, and Japan is just overmatched here. Coach Takeshi Okada will be roundly derided for his prediction of a semifinal berth, and fired before Japan gets on the plane home with not only no points ... but no goals.
Group F:
Italy 1, Paraguay 0; Slovakia 2, New Zealand 0.
Paraguay 2, Slovakia 0; Italy 2, New Zealand 0.
Italy 1, Slovakia 0; Paraguay 2, New Zealand 1.
Standings: Italy 9 points (plus-4 differential), Paraguay 6 (plus-2), Slovakia 3 (minus-1), New Zealand 0 (minus-5).
My thoughts: Italy landed in the weakest group of the tournament and may not even break a sweat while playing its usual conservative style -- packing it in on defense and coming forward just enough to get the goal or two it needs to win. If you're betting on the "one team most likely to make the second round," Italy is as good a choice as anyone. Yes, including Spain and Brazil. ... The Paraguay-Slovakia game is the pivotal in determining who gets out of the group. We think the underrated South Americans, led by Roque Santa Cruz and Oscar Cardoza, will not be deterred by their opening defeat against Italy and will bounce back to handle Slovakia, which hasn't played well in about a year and won't last long in its first World Cup appearance. ... But we like the Slovaks to handle semi-professional New Zealand, the weakest side in the tournament. Yes, weaker even than Japan, even though we see the Kiwis scrounging up a goal in the "means nothing" match with the Slovaks. Read more!
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Predictions! For Groups C and D
Moving along with our crystal-ball look at South Africa 2010.
Today, how we see things shaking out in groups C and D.
Group C:
England 3, United States 1; Slovenia 2, Algeria 1.
Slovenia 1, United States 1; England 2, Algeria 0.
England 2, Slovenia 1; United States 3, Algeria 0.
Standings: England 9 points (plus-5 goal differential), United States 4 (plus-0; 5 GF), Slovenia 4 (plus-0, 4 GF), Algeria 0 (minus-6).
My thinking: England walks through. The Three Lions aren't as good as England prefers to think, but I see them scoring with relative ease against the U.S., overpowering Algeria and playing just hard enough to defeat Slovenia even when a tie would win them the group. I anticipate an ultra-tight race for the second spot in the knockout phase between the Yanks and the Slovenes, and this one comes down to Goals For, with the U.S. squeaking through with a late goal against nothing-to-play-for Algeria -- much as the U.S. advanced in the Confederations Cup in South Africa a year ago by beating Egypt 3-0. ... The schedule sets up well for the Slovenes; they get the weakest team in the group up front while the Yanks face the English. The key to the U.S. campaign will be ignoring the daunting history of teams losing their first match (they rarely advance to the knockout round) and taking a point from Slovenia, then piling up a big victory over Algeria. Algeria just doesn't look ready to play Cup-winning football. Also, coming from north Africa, the home-continent advantage doesn't seem as if it will be as big a deal for Algeria.
Group D:
Serbia 3, Ghana 2; Germany 2, Australia 0.
Germany 1, Serbia 1; Ghana 2, Australia 1.
Germany 1, Ghana 0; Serbia 2, Austalia 0.
Standings: Serbia 7 points (plus-3 goal differential, 6 GF), Germany 7 (plus-3, 4 GF), Ghana 3 (minus-1), Australia 0 (minus-5).
My thinking: Serbia and Germany will take this group down to the final minute, and a late goal by Serbia will give it the tiebreaker it needs to win the the group. The key match for Serbia will be the first, when it gets dangerous Ghana in its opener before a pro-Ghana crowd. Serbia's craftiness will get it just enough goals to get three points as Germany is taking care of Australia. Then, in a cautious (both ways) second match, the Serbs and Germans play to a tie (and it could be 0-0, as well), each confident it needs only a point in that match because each plans to win its final match, and does. ... Ghana will be a handful for everyone, but only against Australia will its physical prowess lead to victory. ... Australia is no slouch, but this is a very tough group. If the World Cup weren't being held in Africa, maybe it is able to beat Ghana, but I don't see it happening in South Africa. Read more!
Today, how we see things shaking out in groups C and D.
Group C:
England 3, United States 1; Slovenia 2, Algeria 1.
Slovenia 1, United States 1; England 2, Algeria 0.
England 2, Slovenia 1; United States 3, Algeria 0.
Standings: England 9 points (plus-5 goal differential), United States 4 (plus-0; 5 GF), Slovenia 4 (plus-0, 4 GF), Algeria 0 (minus-6).
My thinking: England walks through. The Three Lions aren't as good as England prefers to think, but I see them scoring with relative ease against the U.S., overpowering Algeria and playing just hard enough to defeat Slovenia even when a tie would win them the group. I anticipate an ultra-tight race for the second spot in the knockout phase between the Yanks and the Slovenes, and this one comes down to Goals For, with the U.S. squeaking through with a late goal against nothing-to-play-for Algeria -- much as the U.S. advanced in the Confederations Cup in South Africa a year ago by beating Egypt 3-0. ... The schedule sets up well for the Slovenes; they get the weakest team in the group up front while the Yanks face the English. The key to the U.S. campaign will be ignoring the daunting history of teams losing their first match (they rarely advance to the knockout round) and taking a point from Slovenia, then piling up a big victory over Algeria. Algeria just doesn't look ready to play Cup-winning football. Also, coming from north Africa, the home-continent advantage doesn't seem as if it will be as big a deal for Algeria.
Group D:
Serbia 3, Ghana 2; Germany 2, Australia 0.
Germany 1, Serbia 1; Ghana 2, Australia 1.
Germany 1, Ghana 0; Serbia 2, Austalia 0.
Standings: Serbia 7 points (plus-3 goal differential, 6 GF), Germany 7 (plus-3, 4 GF), Ghana 3 (minus-1), Australia 0 (minus-5).
My thinking: Serbia and Germany will take this group down to the final minute, and a late goal by Serbia will give it the tiebreaker it needs to win the the group. The key match for Serbia will be the first, when it gets dangerous Ghana in its opener before a pro-Ghana crowd. Serbia's craftiness will get it just enough goals to get three points as Germany is taking care of Australia. Then, in a cautious (both ways) second match, the Serbs and Germans play to a tie (and it could be 0-0, as well), each confident it needs only a point in that match because each plans to win its final match, and does. ... Ghana will be a handful for everyone, but only against Australia will its physical prowess lead to victory. ... Australia is no slouch, but this is a very tough group. If the World Cup weren't being held in Africa, maybe it is able to beat Ghana, but I don't see it happening in South Africa. Read more!
Monday, June 7, 2010
Predictions! For Groups A and B
I've been doing the Countdown to South Africa 2010 World Cup blog since last July. I feel as if I know a little about all 32 teams. More than a little. Enough, actually, that I've forgotten a fair share of it.
I concede, I do not know as much as you know about your team. (Unless your team is the U.S.) No way. But what do you know of North Korea, Paraguay and Honduras? Aha!
We will start with group-phase predictions for groups A and B. On Tuesday, groups C and D. On Wednesday, groups E and F. On Thursday, groups G and H.
And on Friday, before the first match kicks off, predictions on the knockout phase, right up to the championship match.
Here we go!
Group A:
Mexico 1, South Africa 1; France 1, Uruguay 0.
South Africa 1, Uruguay 1; Mexico 2, France 2.
Mexico 2, Uruguay 1; France 1, South Africa 0.
Standings: France 7 points (plus-2), Mexico 5 (plus-1), South Africa 2 (minus-1), Uruguay 2 (minus-1).
My thinking: France is poorly led by Raymond Domenech, but the French have considerable talent and have played in big matches -- and have the considerable advantage of a favorable schedule. I would pick Mexico to win this group, except that Mexico gets South Africa in the opener, and the host team won't know yet it isn't going to advance and will play out of its mind in a very supportive atmosphere, the sort that will influence a referee. So, Mexico gets only a draw out of that match. But by the time South Africa gets to its third match and knows it is basically out of it, France wins. Uruguay just not up to getting out of this group, even though it is better than South Africa on a neutral field.
Group B:
Greece 1, South Korea 0; Argentina 3, Nigeria 2.
Argentina 3, South Korea 1; Greece 1, Nigeria 0.
Nigeria 3, South Korea 1; Argentina 0, Greece 0.
Standings: Argentina 7 points (plus-3), Greece 7 (plus-2), Nigeria 3 (plus-0), South Korea 0 (minus-4).
My thinking: This is an outstanding group for the Greeks and coach Otto Rehhegel. Three teams it should frustrate to madness with its ultra-conservative occasional-counter style. Euro teams that know the Greeks have trouble with it, and these three haven't seen it. ... Argentina has so much talent that not even Diego "El Jefe Loco" Maradona can mess up the group stage. I'm pretty sure. ... Nigeria could get the "home continent" boost, but its results just haven't been that impressive of late, and Greece will frustrate it and Argentina will have too much talent. Nigeria will take out its frustrations on South Korea in the final match, and then the country will sit back and rue the cheesy late goal that Greece scored in the opening match. South Korea is the better of the Koreas, but this is not a good group for it. Maybe next time. Read more!
I concede, I do not know as much as you know about your team. (Unless your team is the U.S.) No way. But what do you know of North Korea, Paraguay and Honduras? Aha!
We will start with group-phase predictions for groups A and B. On Tuesday, groups C and D. On Wednesday, groups E and F. On Thursday, groups G and H.
And on Friday, before the first match kicks off, predictions on the knockout phase, right up to the championship match.
Here we go!
Group A:
Mexico 1, South Africa 1; France 1, Uruguay 0.
South Africa 1, Uruguay 1; Mexico 2, France 2.
Mexico 2, Uruguay 1; France 1, South Africa 0.
Standings: France 7 points (plus-2), Mexico 5 (plus-1), South Africa 2 (minus-1), Uruguay 2 (minus-1).
My thinking: France is poorly led by Raymond Domenech, but the French have considerable talent and have played in big matches -- and have the considerable advantage of a favorable schedule. I would pick Mexico to win this group, except that Mexico gets South Africa in the opener, and the host team won't know yet it isn't going to advance and will play out of its mind in a very supportive atmosphere, the sort that will influence a referee. So, Mexico gets only a draw out of that match. But by the time South Africa gets to its third match and knows it is basically out of it, France wins. Uruguay just not up to getting out of this group, even though it is better than South Africa on a neutral field.
Group B:
Greece 1, South Korea 0; Argentina 3, Nigeria 2.
Argentina 3, South Korea 1; Greece 1, Nigeria 0.
Nigeria 3, South Korea 1; Argentina 0, Greece 0.
Standings: Argentina 7 points (plus-3), Greece 7 (plus-2), Nigeria 3 (plus-0), South Korea 0 (minus-4).
My thinking: This is an outstanding group for the Greeks and coach Otto Rehhegel. Three teams it should frustrate to madness with its ultra-conservative occasional-counter style. Euro teams that know the Greeks have trouble with it, and these three haven't seen it. ... Argentina has so much talent that not even Diego "El Jefe Loco" Maradona can mess up the group stage. I'm pretty sure. ... Nigeria could get the "home continent" boost, but its results just haven't been that impressive of late, and Greece will frustrate it and Argentina will have too much talent. Nigeria will take out its frustrations on South Korea in the final match, and then the country will sit back and rue the cheesy late goal that Greece scored in the opening match. South Korea is the better of the Koreas, but this is not a good group for it. Maybe next time. Read more!
Local Lingo You Should Know
The Johannesburg Times has compiled a list of 40 South Africanisms you should know.
These are intended for World Cup tourists ... but for those of us who will be following the event, it doesn't hurt to know what they mean. And maybe toss a few of them at the TV, now and then. Like, "I need a 'dop' or 10 because we played so badly. And I don't care if I have the 'babbelas' to end all 'babbelas' in the morning."
It strikes me that The Times could be making all of these up. But they should legit ... a sort of mix of Afrikaans and black African words.
A few other interesting usages:
BLIKSEM (BLUK-SEM): If you're in a pub and you accidentally spill a beer belonging to a man with a thick neck, he may say: "Do you want me to bliksem you?" Don't respond. Just run. Run for your life. It's the Afrikaans word for hit or strike or punch.
DAGGA: Again pronounced with a harsh "g". Marijuana. Illegal, but admittedly very easy to get hold if you're so inclined.
DOF: Stupid.
EISH (AYSH): Common term that denotes a wide range of emotions from joy and surprise to confusion and anger. When in doubt, use it.
HUNDREDS: Normally repeated twice in a sentence as in "Hundreds, bru, hundreds." It expresses either total agreement with what someone has just said, or confirmation that your life is all good (eg: "How are you?" "Ah, hundreds, man, hundreds"). Can also be used as a way of simply saying yes.
JOL: Party. Can be used as either a noun or verb, as in "That was a lekker jol" or "I went jolling last night and ended up in Fabio Cannavaro's hotel room. It was great. We set fire to it."
LANK: Beyond cool is lank cool. Also means a large amount of, as in "There were lank vuvuzelas at the game last night."
LEKKER (LAKKA): Great, awesome, amazing.
NOOIT (NOYT): Expression of disbelief or disdain. As in "Aah, nooit! There's chewing gum on my seat!" or "When I saw that advert with Ronaldo striking a homoerotic pose in a pair of tight underpants, I just thought 'Nooit, bru!'"
ROBOT: When you're asking for directions and someone says: "Left at the third robot," it is not because our streets are overrun with menacing cyborgs made by Japanese scientists. No. A robot is simply our word for traffic light.
SIFF: Gross, disgusting. "Check, that guy is picking his nose." "Siff, boet."
If you want to see the entire list ... follow the link, up in the first line. Read more!
These are intended for World Cup tourists ... but for those of us who will be following the event, it doesn't hurt to know what they mean. And maybe toss a few of them at the TV, now and then. Like, "I need a 'dop' or 10 because we played so badly. And I don't care if I have the 'babbelas' to end all 'babbelas' in the morning."
It strikes me that The Times could be making all of these up. But they should legit ... a sort of mix of Afrikaans and black African words.
A few other interesting usages:
BLIKSEM (BLUK-SEM): If you're in a pub and you accidentally spill a beer belonging to a man with a thick neck, he may say: "Do you want me to bliksem you?" Don't respond. Just run. Run for your life. It's the Afrikaans word for hit or strike or punch.
DAGGA: Again pronounced with a harsh "g". Marijuana. Illegal, but admittedly very easy to get hold if you're so inclined.
DOF: Stupid.
EISH (AYSH): Common term that denotes a wide range of emotions from joy and surprise to confusion and anger. When in doubt, use it.
HUNDREDS: Normally repeated twice in a sentence as in "Hundreds, bru, hundreds." It expresses either total agreement with what someone has just said, or confirmation that your life is all good (eg: "How are you?" "Ah, hundreds, man, hundreds"). Can also be used as a way of simply saying yes.
JOL: Party. Can be used as either a noun or verb, as in "That was a lekker jol" or "I went jolling last night and ended up in Fabio Cannavaro's hotel room. It was great. We set fire to it."
LANK: Beyond cool is lank cool. Also means a large amount of, as in "There were lank vuvuzelas at the game last night."
LEKKER (LAKKA): Great, awesome, amazing.
NOOIT (NOYT): Expression of disbelief or disdain. As in "Aah, nooit! There's chewing gum on my seat!" or "When I saw that advert with Ronaldo striking a homoerotic pose in a pair of tight underpants, I just thought 'Nooit, bru!'"
ROBOT: When you're asking for directions and someone says: "Left at the third robot," it is not because our streets are overrun with menacing cyborgs made by Japanese scientists. No. A robot is simply our word for traffic light.
SIFF: Gross, disgusting. "Check, that guy is picking his nose." "Siff, boet."
If you want to see the entire list ... follow the link, up in the first line. Read more!
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Paper Describes 'Fifa's Great SA Rip-Off'
It appears that some media outlets have tumbled to the notion that Fifa, soccer's international ruling body, is not a philanthropic organization.
And some of the media are ticked.
Specifically one City Press, a Sunday newspaper which has published a scathing report on tax breaks Fifa will get during the World Cup, as well as a variety of other advantages the country agreed to give Fifa -- presumably before Fifa boss Sepp Blatter and the lads agreed to do such a forward-looking thing as award the World Cup to Africa.
The deals could lead to the staging of the event costing South Africa's government hundreds of thousands of dollars in tax revenue, the newspaper suggests. Oh, and one unnamed government official is quoted as saying, "Fifa are a bunch of thugs. Not even the UN expects you sign away your tax base. These mafiosos do."
The crux of the problem, the newspaper suggests, is that the South African government agreed to a "tax bubble" around almost all things "2010 World Cup," which "exempts Fifa, its subsidiaries and foreign football associations from paying income tax, customs duties and value added tax (VAT)."
As the newspaper not-so-daintily put it: "For the next five weeks get used to Sepp Blatter being your president and (actual president) Jacob Zuma sitting on the bench as a bit player whose government is legally bound to perform the international football federation's every bidding."
The Johannesburg Times, a more cautious newspaper, has picked up the story, crediting the City Press, but leading with the idea that the World Cup was never supposed to be about making money.
It uses a quote from the South Africa Revenue Service (SARS) up front, but only in part.
According to the City Press, SARS spokesman Adrian Lackay said, "From the perspective of what we spent as a country and from what the country stands to make in terms of revenue and profits it is almost negligible.
"Our approach to the World Cup is that it was never going to be a revenue-raising exercise. Certainly it would be wrong to view the World Cup contributor in itself.
"The concessions we had to give to Fifa are simply too demanding and overwhelming for us to have material monetary benefits."
However, the national press association quotes Lackay as saying, "It's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and there's a cost that comes with that" -- and that is the quote The Times uses.
The Times does a good job of summing up what Fifa has been guaranteed:
"A supportive financial environment by waiving customs duties, taxes and levies on the import and export of goods belonging to the Fifa delegation, its commercial affiliates, broadcast rights holders, media and spectators;
"Unconditional visas to foreign visitors and anybody in any way associated with Fifa;
"The unrestricted import and export of all foreign currencies into and from South Africa;
"Free work permits to delegates, media and merchandise partners;
"Ownership of all media, marketing and intellectual property;
"And that Fifa cannot be sued for claims arising from the staging of the tournament."
Hmm.
Oh, and just FYI ... the City Press misspelled the SARS spokesman's name.It is Lackay, not Lackey. So take that into account if you want to evaluate your sources.
Still, it is good to have one angry media source out there, even if not every particular of what it has reported is correct.
The reality of this is ... that Fifa probably gets many (most? all?) of the same concessions from other host countries. "You should consider yourself lucky that we are coming to your home" is the guiding principle behind the awarding of berths. And if you are not living in a wealthy country, you probably shouldn't be staging the World Cup.
Anyway, who is getting rich of this World Cup? Not the South African government. That seems clear. Not unless you want to consider potential long-term (and probably unmeasurable) benefits such as all that presumably positive publicity SA will get over the next month -- which will want us all, people and companies, to go there and spend money. In the future.
Not sure that always works out. Read more!
And some of the media are ticked.
Specifically one City Press, a Sunday newspaper which has published a scathing report on tax breaks Fifa will get during the World Cup, as well as a variety of other advantages the country agreed to give Fifa -- presumably before Fifa boss Sepp Blatter and the lads agreed to do such a forward-looking thing as award the World Cup to Africa.
The deals could lead to the staging of the event costing South Africa's government hundreds of thousands of dollars in tax revenue, the newspaper suggests. Oh, and one unnamed government official is quoted as saying, "Fifa are a bunch of thugs. Not even the UN expects you sign away your tax base. These mafiosos do."
The crux of the problem, the newspaper suggests, is that the South African government agreed to a "tax bubble" around almost all things "2010 World Cup," which "exempts Fifa, its subsidiaries and foreign football associations from paying income tax, customs duties and value added tax (VAT)."
As the newspaper not-so-daintily put it: "For the next five weeks get used to Sepp Blatter being your president and (actual president) Jacob Zuma sitting on the bench as a bit player whose government is legally bound to perform the international football federation's every bidding."
The Johannesburg Times, a more cautious newspaper, has picked up the story, crediting the City Press, but leading with the idea that the World Cup was never supposed to be about making money.
It uses a quote from the South Africa Revenue Service (SARS) up front, but only in part.
According to the City Press, SARS spokesman Adrian Lackay said, "From the perspective of what we spent as a country and from what the country stands to make in terms of revenue and profits it is almost negligible.
"Our approach to the World Cup is that it was never going to be a revenue-raising exercise. Certainly it would be wrong to view the World Cup contributor in itself.
"The concessions we had to give to Fifa are simply too demanding and overwhelming for us to have material monetary benefits."
However, the national press association quotes Lackay as saying, "It's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, and there's a cost that comes with that" -- and that is the quote The Times uses.
The Times does a good job of summing up what Fifa has been guaranteed:
"A supportive financial environment by waiving customs duties, taxes and levies on the import and export of goods belonging to the Fifa delegation, its commercial affiliates, broadcast rights holders, media and spectators;
"Unconditional visas to foreign visitors and anybody in any way associated with Fifa;
"The unrestricted import and export of all foreign currencies into and from South Africa;
"Free work permits to delegates, media and merchandise partners;
"Ownership of all media, marketing and intellectual property;
"And that Fifa cannot be sued for claims arising from the staging of the tournament."
Hmm.
Oh, and just FYI ... the City Press misspelled the SARS spokesman's name.It is Lackay, not Lackey. So take that into account if you want to evaluate your sources.
Still, it is good to have one angry media source out there, even if not every particular of what it has reported is correct.
The reality of this is ... that Fifa probably gets many (most? all?) of the same concessions from other host countries. "You should consider yourself lucky that we are coming to your home" is the guiding principle behind the awarding of berths. And if you are not living in a wealthy country, you probably shouldn't be staging the World Cup.
Anyway, who is getting rich of this World Cup? Not the South African government. That seems clear. Not unless you want to consider potential long-term (and probably unmeasurable) benefits such as all that presumably positive publicity SA will get over the next month -- which will want us all, people and companies, to go there and spend money. In the future.
Not sure that always works out. Read more!
Saturday, June 5, 2010
Add Drogba, Ferdinand to Injury List
The number of elite players who apparently will not play in South Africa 2010 continues to grow. Which is awful for the players, tough on their teams and a pity for fans of the greatest show in sports.
The latest casualties:
Didier Drogba of Ivory Coast and Rio Ferdinand of England.
Drogba suffered what is thought to be a broken elbow, which makes us wince just to imagine, in a friendly against Japan.
Drogba, a standout for Premier League champion Chelsea, is/was the key attacking player for Ivory Coast and the single biggest reason why the Elephants were a trendy choice to make the semifinals. (The theory being one of the six African teams will get to the final four.)
Ivory Coast remains a formidable crew, but considering the Ivorians are in the official SA2010 "Group of Death" -- with Brazil and Portugal (and North Korea) -- trying to get out of the group stage may be too much to ask, without Drogba.
Why? Well, because Drogba has scored 42 goals in 67 appearances for the national team. Without him, Ivory Coast can't be as dangerous.
Rio Ferdinand is just the latest England captain (past or present) to run into trouble. Following David Beckham, the former captain who suffered a torn Achilles tendon in May (and is in South Africa as a coach/cheerleader), John Terry, another former captain who remains on the squad but gave up the captaincy after a sex scandal and now Ferdinand, who got the captaincy after Terry was forced out.
Ferdinand suffered a knee injury in training and definitely is out.
Michael Ballack of Germany is also out, as is midfielder Michael Essien of Ghana. Spain striker Fernando Torres may or may not be back in time for his team's first match, Portugal superstar Cristiano Ronaldo has an ouchy, as does Brazilian midfielder Kaka, Chilean striker Humberto Suazo will miss at least home match, maybe two ... and various key players (Midfielder Andrea Pirlo of Italy, goalkeeper Julio Cesar of Brazil, forward Jozy Altidore of the U.S., etc) seem to be getting nicked up during almost every "friendly" the 32 national teams are playing in the run-up to the tournament, which begins Friday.
That's most of a really formidable First XI who are not ready to play.
Again, the goal for every World Cup: the best players for all 32 teams.
It is too much to ask, of course. But we seem to be getting a rash of major injuries right here on the eve of the World Cup. Read more!
The latest casualties:
Didier Drogba of Ivory Coast and Rio Ferdinand of England.
Drogba suffered what is thought to be a broken elbow, which makes us wince just to imagine, in a friendly against Japan.
Drogba, a standout for Premier League champion Chelsea, is/was the key attacking player for Ivory Coast and the single biggest reason why the Elephants were a trendy choice to make the semifinals. (The theory being one of the six African teams will get to the final four.)
Ivory Coast remains a formidable crew, but considering the Ivorians are in the official SA2010 "Group of Death" -- with Brazil and Portugal (and North Korea) -- trying to get out of the group stage may be too much to ask, without Drogba.
Why? Well, because Drogba has scored 42 goals in 67 appearances for the national team. Without him, Ivory Coast can't be as dangerous.
Rio Ferdinand is just the latest England captain (past or present) to run into trouble. Following David Beckham, the former captain who suffered a torn Achilles tendon in May (and is in South Africa as a coach/cheerleader), John Terry, another former captain who remains on the squad but gave up the captaincy after a sex scandal and now Ferdinand, who got the captaincy after Terry was forced out.
Ferdinand suffered a knee injury in training and definitely is out.
Michael Ballack of Germany is also out, as is midfielder Michael Essien of Ghana. Spain striker Fernando Torres may or may not be back in time for his team's first match, Portugal superstar Cristiano Ronaldo has an ouchy, as does Brazilian midfielder Kaka, Chilean striker Humberto Suazo will miss at least home match, maybe two ... and various key players (Midfielder Andrea Pirlo of Italy, goalkeeper Julio Cesar of Brazil, forward Jozy Altidore of the U.S., etc) seem to be getting nicked up during almost every "friendly" the 32 national teams are playing in the run-up to the tournament, which begins Friday.
That's most of a really formidable First XI who are not ready to play.
Again, the goal for every World Cup: the best players for all 32 teams.
It is too much to ask, of course. But we seem to be getting a rash of major injuries right here on the eve of the World Cup. Read more!
Friday, June 4, 2010
Spain Potential Payday Draws Criticism
Unemployment in Spain is running at 20 percent. When talking about the financial crises in Europe, Spain comes up in the discussion not long after Greece and Portugal.
Hence, some are asking ... why Spain has the highest cash-reward system for its players of the 32 teams about to begin play at South Africa 2010.
How much money can the lads of "La Roja" earn if they win the World Cup?
Deep breath:
Spain's players will be given about $735,000 each if they win the World Cup. And remember, Spain is the co-favorite, with Brazil, to win the championship.
As this Johannesburg Times story points out, Spain's bonus structure is more than twice that of Germany, a country with far more wealth than Spain.
The Spaniards will get about $73,500 if they reach the quarterfinals, about $110,00 if they reach the semis and about $147,000 if they reach the final but lose.
And remember, that is each. Per player.
A left-of-center political party based in Barcelona pointed out that "the 14 million euros that 24 individuals (including manager Vicente del Bosque) would pocket is the equivalent of the wages of a thousand ordinary people for a whole year of work."
The Times story notes that, "an online opinion poll taken by Madrid newspaper El Mundo showed on Friday that no less than 93 percent of readers considered the bonus 'excessive.'
"On the website of sports daily Marca, 84.9 percent of readers were opposed to the bonus.
"According to Marca, the Argentine federation has promised a bonus of 510,000 euros (about $620,000) to each player if they triumph in South Africa, the second-highest bonus after the Spanish one.
"The English FA has, apparently, agreed to a bonus of 475,000 euros, while the players of France would get 390,000 euros, Italy's 240,000 and those of Brazil 180,000.
Hmmm. Spain loves its team, and would love to see La Roja win a World Cup. But maybe the love and admiration of their countrymen should be motivation enough for the players. Do they really need all that money as a reward for playing well on the planet's biggest sports stage? Read more!
Hence, some are asking ... why Spain has the highest cash-reward system for its players of the 32 teams about to begin play at South Africa 2010.
How much money can the lads of "La Roja" earn if they win the World Cup?
Deep breath:
Spain's players will be given about $735,000 each if they win the World Cup. And remember, Spain is the co-favorite, with Brazil, to win the championship.
As this Johannesburg Times story points out, Spain's bonus structure is more than twice that of Germany, a country with far more wealth than Spain.
The Spaniards will get about $73,500 if they reach the quarterfinals, about $110,00 if they reach the semis and about $147,000 if they reach the final but lose.
And remember, that is each. Per player.
A left-of-center political party based in Barcelona pointed out that "the 14 million euros that 24 individuals (including manager Vicente del Bosque) would pocket is the equivalent of the wages of a thousand ordinary people for a whole year of work."
The Times story notes that, "an online opinion poll taken by Madrid newspaper El Mundo showed on Friday that no less than 93 percent of readers considered the bonus 'excessive.'
"On the website of sports daily Marca, 84.9 percent of readers were opposed to the bonus.
"According to Marca, the Argentine federation has promised a bonus of 510,000 euros (about $620,000) to each player if they triumph in South Africa, the second-highest bonus after the Spanish one.
"The English FA has, apparently, agreed to a bonus of 475,000 euros, while the players of France would get 390,000 euros, Italy's 240,000 and those of Brazil 180,000.
Hmmm. Spain loves its team, and would love to see La Roja win a World Cup. But maybe the love and admiration of their countrymen should be motivation enough for the players. Do they really need all that money as a reward for playing well on the planet's biggest sports stage? Read more!
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Zuma's Cheating No. 2 Wife?
We have put up well over 300 entries on this blog since it began last July, and this may be, oh, about No.50 about how South Africa 2010 will be unlike any World Cup to come before.
And here is No. 51:
Jacob Zuma, president of South Africa, apparently is returning from a state visit in India to have a family meeting at which will be discussed the paternity of the child his pregnant second wife is carrying. The news here being, the family apparently isn't sure the child is the president's.
In theory, I suppose, such a story could have made headlines ahead of World Cups over the past 80 years ... but the reality is, they did not.
It occurs to me, an outsider to South African and Zulu culture (Zuma is a Zulu), that part of the problem here might be that Prez Zuma has four wives. Or is it five?
(OK, I've checked, and it appears to be four wives. He had a fifth wife, but she committed suicide in a decade ago. For more, see the "personal life" section of this link.)
What is a bit confusing is the contention, in the Johannesburg Times, that the potentially cheating wife is Zuma's "second wife" when she appears to have been the fourth woman to marry him.
Oops. OK. Figured this out, too. Zuma divorced his original second wife, and the original No. 3 was the suicide, so the original No. 4 moves up to "second wife" status. She, by the way, is 35. The Prez is 68.
Anyway, a head of state and openly discussed issues with his polygamy and parentage ... not something you will see at every World Cup.
Read more!
And here is No. 51:
Jacob Zuma, president of South Africa, apparently is returning from a state visit in India to have a family meeting at which will be discussed the paternity of the child his pregnant second wife is carrying. The news here being, the family apparently isn't sure the child is the president's.
In theory, I suppose, such a story could have made headlines ahead of World Cups over the past 80 years ... but the reality is, they did not.
It occurs to me, an outsider to South African and Zulu culture (Zuma is a Zulu), that part of the problem here might be that Prez Zuma has four wives. Or is it five?
(OK, I've checked, and it appears to be four wives. He had a fifth wife, but she committed suicide in a decade ago. For more, see the "personal life" section of this link.)
What is a bit confusing is the contention, in the Johannesburg Times, that the potentially cheating wife is Zuma's "second wife" when she appears to have been the fourth woman to marry him.
Oops. OK. Figured this out, too. Zuma divorced his original second wife, and the original No. 3 was the suicide, so the original No. 4 moves up to "second wife" status. She, by the way, is 35. The Prez is 68.
Anyway, a head of state and openly discussed issues with his polygamy and parentage ... not something you will see at every World Cup.
Read more!
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Japan Coach Derided
About now, everybody in the World Cup is talking up everyone else. "Algeria looks tough." "Slovakia could be dangerous." "Have to respect New Zealand." It's a sports tradition to insist overlooked opponents are stronger than they really are.
And then there is Japan, which is perhaps the only national side in South Africa 2010 regularly receiving abuse from outsiders.
Basically, for two reasons:
Japan has never done much in the World Cup ... and its coach predicted his team will reach (gulp!) the semifinals.
Now it's open season on poor Japan. Which seems ready to dump its overly confident coach even before Japan has lost its first Group E match. Japan is grouped with Netherlands, Cameroon and Denmark, a tough crew for anyone.
The Johannesburg Times has an AFP story in which coach Takeshi Okada is mocked for his "semifinals" prediction, noting "the football world only scratched its head when Takeshi Okada repeatedly insisted that Japan could make the semifinals in South Africa.
"The home-grown manager’s target has even confused his players and angered supporters as a 'bad joke' as the Blue Samurai struggled against rank outsiders in recent internationals amid persistent calls for his resignation."
Ugh.
A local sports journalist trashed the coach, as well. "Okada’s goal has become just a bad joke," popular soccer writer Tatsuhito Kaneko wrote in his column after Japan lost 3-0 to a second-string Serbia in a home warm-up match in April.
"It is like ordering the current national team to walk to the moon," he added. "What is needed is a handy and specific goal which can excite the fans and inspire the players to work a bit harder."
Japan's only World Cup success came in 2002, when it advanced out of the group stage -- while co-hosting the event with Korea -- and lost in the round of 16. That was when Frenchman Philippe Troussier coached the team, not the overmatched Okada.
Troussier suggested Okada was trying to get some attention for his team.
"The world is looking down on Japan," he said, adding Europe "lacks respect" for little-known Japan. "Manager Okada may be trying to demonstrate Japan’s pride to the world."
Well, OK. Sure. "You boys can win!" Sometimes that works.
But it isn't working in Japan itself. A Japanese newspaper conducted a survey in which 80 percent of respondents said Japan would not win a match in South Africa. Which, actually, sounds about right, no matter Okada's high expectations. Read more!
And then there is Japan, which is perhaps the only national side in South Africa 2010 regularly receiving abuse from outsiders.
Basically, for two reasons:
Japan has never done much in the World Cup ... and its coach predicted his team will reach (gulp!) the semifinals.
Now it's open season on poor Japan. Which seems ready to dump its overly confident coach even before Japan has lost its first Group E match. Japan is grouped with Netherlands, Cameroon and Denmark, a tough crew for anyone.
The Johannesburg Times has an AFP story in which coach Takeshi Okada is mocked for his "semifinals" prediction, noting "the football world only scratched its head when Takeshi Okada repeatedly insisted that Japan could make the semifinals in South Africa.
"The home-grown manager’s target has even confused his players and angered supporters as a 'bad joke' as the Blue Samurai struggled against rank outsiders in recent internationals amid persistent calls for his resignation."
Ugh.
A local sports journalist trashed the coach, as well. "Okada’s goal has become just a bad joke," popular soccer writer Tatsuhito Kaneko wrote in his column after Japan lost 3-0 to a second-string Serbia in a home warm-up match in April.
"It is like ordering the current national team to walk to the moon," he added. "What is needed is a handy and specific goal which can excite the fans and inspire the players to work a bit harder."
Japan's only World Cup success came in 2002, when it advanced out of the group stage -- while co-hosting the event with Korea -- and lost in the round of 16. That was when Frenchman Philippe Troussier coached the team, not the overmatched Okada.
Troussier suggested Okada was trying to get some attention for his team.
"The world is looking down on Japan," he said, adding Europe "lacks respect" for little-known Japan. "Manager Okada may be trying to demonstrate Japan’s pride to the world."
Well, OK. Sure. "You boys can win!" Sometimes that works.
But it isn't working in Japan itself. A Japanese newspaper conducted a survey in which 80 percent of respondents said Japan would not win a match in South Africa. Which, actually, sounds about right, no matter Okada's high expectations. Read more!
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Not Speaking Their Language at Cup
Remember, South Africa 2010 is different. Like no World Cup before it.
Another indication:
The country has 11 "official" languages. But the World Cup will be broadcast, on TV, in "only" five of them.
Which is an issue for some South Africa politicians, as this Johannesburg Times story indicates.
Here are the languages the World Cup will be televised in, in South Africa:
English, Tswana, Xhosa, Sotho and Zulu.
What the story doesn't indicate is the six languages which will get the World Cup only on radio.
And they are ... Afrikaans, IsiNdebele, Sepedi, Setswana, SiSwati, Xitsonga. A dollar to everyone who knew that.
Not many countries in the world, aside perhaps from India ... where 11 "official" languages exist.
Be interesting to see if the South African broadcasters suddenly come up with six more TV crews. Really, though, we can see how it would be a burden on a broadcaster to generate 11 broadcast teams, one per official language ... That's a lot of crew.
Let's guess and say most South Africans have some knowledge of one of the four languages that will be on TV, and they can muddle through.
Failing that, they can do what Los Angeles Dodgers fans do when someone other than the official broadcaster is going the TV: Watch the video feed and turn down the sound and listen to Vin Scully on radio. Or the Sepedi radio broadcast.
The politicians are agitated, but let's assume the viewers/listeners will figure it out. Read more!
Another indication:
The country has 11 "official" languages. But the World Cup will be broadcast, on TV, in "only" five of them.
Which is an issue for some South Africa politicians, as this Johannesburg Times story indicates.
Here are the languages the World Cup will be televised in, in South Africa:
English, Tswana, Xhosa, Sotho and Zulu.
What the story doesn't indicate is the six languages which will get the World Cup only on radio.
And they are ... Afrikaans, IsiNdebele, Sepedi, Setswana, SiSwati, Xitsonga. A dollar to everyone who knew that.
Not many countries in the world, aside perhaps from India ... where 11 "official" languages exist.
Be interesting to see if the South African broadcasters suddenly come up with six more TV crews. Really, though, we can see how it would be a burden on a broadcaster to generate 11 broadcast teams, one per official language ... That's a lot of crew.
Let's guess and say most South Africans have some knowledge of one of the four languages that will be on TV, and they can muddle through.
Failing that, they can do what Los Angeles Dodgers fans do when someone other than the official broadcaster is going the TV: Watch the video feed and turn down the sound and listen to Vin Scully on radio. Or the Sepedi radio broadcast.
The politicians are agitated, but let's assume the viewers/listeners will figure it out. Read more!
Monday, May 31, 2010
Adidas Tired of Being Kicked Around
After enduring several days of harsh criticism of the balls it is rolling out for South Africa 2010, sports equipment giant Adidas is fighting back.
The complaints about the "Jabulani" ball (they all have to have names, for marketing purposes) have been both general and specific.
To recap:
Julio Cesar, Brazil's goalkeeper, called the Jabulani ball "terrible" and compared it to the cheesy kind of ball you would buy in a grocery store.
Italian forward Giampaolo Pazzini called it a "disaster", adding, "It moves so much and makes it difficult to control. You jump up to head a cross and suddenly the ball will move and you miss it. It is especially bad for the goalkeepers if it means they concede a goal because they can't judge the trajectory."
Said Brazil midfielder Julio Baptista: "There is no way to hide it. It's bad for the goalkeepers and it's bad for us. It's really bad. The players try to cross it and it goes to the opposite direction they intended it to go."
Said Spain goalie Iker Casillas: "It's sad that that such an important competition like the World Cup has such an important element like this ball of appalling condition."
It is something of a World Cup tradition for Adidas to come out with a new ball, and for players to complain about it. But usually, it's only the goalkeepers who are complaining. The criticism this time seems wider and deeper.
So now, Adidas has responded. And to boil it down, the German company says the players are 1) smokin' crack or 2) cretins who didn't bother to practice with the thing even though it has been available for months.
Complaints about sports equipment are not new, and they are not always unwarranted.
Remember the "new and improved" National Basketball Association ball made of synthetic something-or-other by Spalding? It was introduced at the start of the 2006-07 season, and players hated it. Hated it. They said it was slippery, and so hard that it split the skin on players' hands. Steve Nash, who was the two-time league MVP at the time, said it "tears my fingers apart."
They complained so much and insisted so strenuously that the old leather ball be returned ... that the league caved in and the players got their old balls back.
It seems unlikely Fifa will do the same. It is an imperious organization that cares far more about sponsors than players.
So World Cup players ... will just have to become accustomed to irregular flight paths ... unless they want to admit it's their fault they didn't embrace the new ball soon enough. That's allowed, too. Read more!
The complaints about the "Jabulani" ball (they all have to have names, for marketing purposes) have been both general and specific.
To recap:
Julio Cesar, Brazil's goalkeeper, called the Jabulani ball "terrible" and compared it to the cheesy kind of ball you would buy in a grocery store.
Italian forward Giampaolo Pazzini called it a "disaster", adding, "It moves so much and makes it difficult to control. You jump up to head a cross and suddenly the ball will move and you miss it. It is especially bad for the goalkeepers if it means they concede a goal because they can't judge the trajectory."
Said Brazil midfielder Julio Baptista: "There is no way to hide it. It's bad for the goalkeepers and it's bad for us. It's really bad. The players try to cross it and it goes to the opposite direction they intended it to go."
Said Spain goalie Iker Casillas: "It's sad that that such an important competition like the World Cup has such an important element like this ball of appalling condition."
It is something of a World Cup tradition for Adidas to come out with a new ball, and for players to complain about it. But usually, it's only the goalkeepers who are complaining. The criticism this time seems wider and deeper.
So now, Adidas has responded. And to boil it down, the German company says the players are 1) smokin' crack or 2) cretins who didn't bother to practice with the thing even though it has been available for months.
Complaints about sports equipment are not new, and they are not always unwarranted.
Remember the "new and improved" National Basketball Association ball made of synthetic something-or-other by Spalding? It was introduced at the start of the 2006-07 season, and players hated it. Hated it. They said it was slippery, and so hard that it split the skin on players' hands. Steve Nash, who was the two-time league MVP at the time, said it "tears my fingers apart."
They complained so much and insisted so strenuously that the old leather ball be returned ... that the league caved in and the players got their old balls back.
It seems unlikely Fifa will do the same. It is an imperious organization that cares far more about sponsors than players.
So World Cup players ... will just have to become accustomed to irregular flight paths ... unless they want to admit it's their fault they didn't embrace the new ball soon enough. That's allowed, too. Read more!
Sunday, May 30, 2010
A South African Vuvuzela-Hater!
I thought it was a law: If you are South African, you love the vuvezela.
(Yes, this is Day 2 of our anti-vuvuzela campaign.)
Turns out, as this Johannesburg Times columnist notes, that the vuvuzela is a recent curse, and that before the turn of the century South Africans routinely sang before, during and after soccer matches.
Which reminds me of ...
Paul Simon, the American singer, doing an entire album -- and quite a musical one -- named "Graceland" entirely with the cooperation and collaboration of South Africans.
And here is our columnist, Mondli Makhanya, ruing the conquest of South African soccer ambience by the vile vuvuzela.
"In two weeks' time, when Bafana Bafana take on Mexico at Soccer City, there will sadly be very little singing in the stands.
"We South Africans, a mighty musical nation if ever there was one, will have replaced hearty renditions with the noise of something called the vuvuzela.
"This instrument, which emits a sound akin to that of a goat on the way to slaughter, is now at the center of a growing row in international football."
He notes that players who were at the Confederations Cup last June complained of the noise. Said Xabi Alonso: "I think Fifa should ban it. It's not really distracting, but it's not a nice sound to hear."
"Last week, football legend and Thailand coach Bryan Robson blamed the vuvuzela for his team's disjointed performance in their friendly against Bafana Bafana at Peter Mokaba stadium. He warned that it would make life difficult for coaches at the World Cup.
"The coaches at the World Cup are definitely going to have to inform their players beforehand that they will have to communicate effectively with each other on the field," the former England and Manchester United midfield dynamo said.
"It's very difficult to get any message to the players from the bench. Coaches are going to have to make that known to their players."
"Word on the street is that several coaches have voiced their disquiet to their national associations, who have in turn conveyed the message to Fifa."
Not that it's going to do any good. South Africans seem to have decided that it is a matter of national pride, which the columnist mocks.
"Predictably, South Africans have been very defensive. A lot of noise has been made about the vuvuzela being part of South African tradition and it being the proverbial 12th man in the Bafana squad ...
"Defending the vuvuzela has now become a patriotic must," the columnist wrote.
"It is as if our nationhood is being challenged by pesky foreigners who want to dictate our behavior on home soil.
"On this one I beg to be unpatriotic and for permission to side with the enemies of the vuvuzela.
"What the vuvuzela has done to our football is to take away the spontaneity of song. Soccer fans do not compose new songs any more. The tribal chants that you hear at great soccer cathedrals such as White Hart Lane and the Santiago Bernabeu are rarely heard in our soccer grounds these days. Except for the Bloemfontein Celtic support base, the music in South African stadiums has been drowned by the dreadful instrument."
I'm right there with you, Mr Makhanya. I wish the vuvuzela would go away. I am pleased you have cited local history for its demise.
Sadly, I think both you and I will be drowned out by the goat-to-slaughter blare of that horrible instrument. Read more!
(Yes, this is Day 2 of our anti-vuvuzela campaign.)
Turns out, as this Johannesburg Times columnist notes, that the vuvuzela is a recent curse, and that before the turn of the century South Africans routinely sang before, during and after soccer matches.
Which reminds me of ...
Paul Simon, the American singer, doing an entire album -- and quite a musical one -- named "Graceland" entirely with the cooperation and collaboration of South Africans.
And here is our columnist, Mondli Makhanya, ruing the conquest of South African soccer ambience by the vile vuvuzela.
"In two weeks' time, when Bafana Bafana take on Mexico at Soccer City, there will sadly be very little singing in the stands.
"We South Africans, a mighty musical nation if ever there was one, will have replaced hearty renditions with the noise of something called the vuvuzela.
"This instrument, which emits a sound akin to that of a goat on the way to slaughter, is now at the center of a growing row in international football."
He notes that players who were at the Confederations Cup last June complained of the noise. Said Xabi Alonso: "I think Fifa should ban it. It's not really distracting, but it's not a nice sound to hear."
"Last week, football legend and Thailand coach Bryan Robson blamed the vuvuzela for his team's disjointed performance in their friendly against Bafana Bafana at Peter Mokaba stadium. He warned that it would make life difficult for coaches at the World Cup.
"The coaches at the World Cup are definitely going to have to inform their players beforehand that they will have to communicate effectively with each other on the field," the former England and Manchester United midfield dynamo said.
"It's very difficult to get any message to the players from the bench. Coaches are going to have to make that known to their players."
"Word on the street is that several coaches have voiced their disquiet to their national associations, who have in turn conveyed the message to Fifa."
Not that it's going to do any good. South Africans seem to have decided that it is a matter of national pride, which the columnist mocks.
"Predictably, South Africans have been very defensive. A lot of noise has been made about the vuvuzela being part of South African tradition and it being the proverbial 12th man in the Bafana squad ...
"Defending the vuvuzela has now become a patriotic must," the columnist wrote.
"It is as if our nationhood is being challenged by pesky foreigners who want to dictate our behavior on home soil.
"On this one I beg to be unpatriotic and for permission to side with the enemies of the vuvuzela.
"What the vuvuzela has done to our football is to take away the spontaneity of song. Soccer fans do not compose new songs any more. The tribal chants that you hear at great soccer cathedrals such as White Hart Lane and the Santiago Bernabeu are rarely heard in our soccer grounds these days. Except for the Bloemfontein Celtic support base, the music in South African stadiums has been drowned by the dreadful instrument."
I'm right there with you, Mr Makhanya. I wish the vuvuzela would go away. I am pleased you have cited local history for its demise.
Sadly, I think both you and I will be drowned out by the goat-to-slaughter blare of that horrible instrument. Read more!
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Vuvuzuelas: Give Them a Rest
Could this be the start of the downfall in the vuvezela tyranny?
The aural cockroach of world sports -- the plastic horns beloved of South African football fans -- were unwelcomed at critical moments of the Bafana Bafana Bafana's match in Soccer City tonight vs. Colombia.
If only we could carry that over to the World Cup.
The vuvuzela is annoying as hell. It costs about 25 cents, so everyone can afford one, and it seems as if everyone does, if last year's Confederations Cup were any indication.
The sound the vuvuzela makes is a sort of one-note trumpet-like blare, and if you get enough of them going, you can't hear yourself think. And a a bit after that, you have thoughts about stuffing your head into a barrel or perhaps choking anyone blowing on a horn.
Danny Jordaan, the president of the organizing committee, said ahead of South Africa's friendly with Colombia that fans shouldn't be blowing on the vuvuzela during national anthems (thank you, Danny) and to cool it enough so that the fans in the stadium could hear instructions via loudspeaker.
Somehow, I don't think that is going to work. Soccer and vuvuzelas are so intertwined now ... any match is going to be two hours of nonstop honking.
Oh and the tournament begins two weeks from today. This thing is imminent. About time to melt down every vuvezela in the country. Read more!
The aural cockroach of world sports -- the plastic horns beloved of South African football fans -- were unwelcomed at critical moments of the Bafana Bafana Bafana's match in Soccer City tonight vs. Colombia.
If only we could carry that over to the World Cup.
The vuvuzela is annoying as hell. It costs about 25 cents, so everyone can afford one, and it seems as if everyone does, if last year's Confederations Cup were any indication.
The sound the vuvuzela makes is a sort of one-note trumpet-like blare, and if you get enough of them going, you can't hear yourself think. And a a bit after that, you have thoughts about stuffing your head into a barrel or perhaps choking anyone blowing on a horn.
Danny Jordaan, the president of the organizing committee, said ahead of South Africa's friendly with Colombia that fans shouldn't be blowing on the vuvuzela during national anthems (thank you, Danny) and to cool it enough so that the fans in the stadium could hear instructions via loudspeaker.
Somehow, I don't think that is going to work. Soccer and vuvuzelas are so intertwined now ... any match is going to be two hours of nonstop honking.
Oh and the tournament begins two weeks from today. This thing is imminent. About time to melt down every vuvezela in the country. Read more!
Friday, May 28, 2010
'Keeper Trashes World Cup Ball
Here's guessing that Julio Cesar does not have a commercial tie with the Adidas brand.
Brazil's elite goalkeeper (and how often have those words been written in the history of soccer?) hates the new ball to be used at South Africa 2010, by Fifa fiat.
How much he not like it?
Well, he said it looks like something "from a grocery store." He also called the ball "horrible" and "terrible." And suggested it was created to make life hard for those poor hard-working men in the nets, the goalkeepers.
Hmm.
Normally, almost nothing a Brazilian goalkeeper might say could be disregarded because Brazil's goalkeepers generally were second-rate and nondescript.
Julio Cesar, however, is different: He just backstopped Inter Milan to the Champions League championship. So he has some credibility.
If you would like to see a semi-scholarly (and Adidas-friendly) review of the ball, check here.
Apparently, the hope at Adidas was to create a ball that was ... oh, perfect. "True" in flight, with a higher ratio of kicking surface because of fewer seams ...
Here is a mugshot of the ball. On amazon.com which, of course, is attempting to sell you one.
And $122 ... on sale?!? No thanks.
I believe I would be quite happy with a soccer ball from, say ... the grocery store Julio Cesar shops at.
Anyway, look for more complaints about the new ball. Athletes never like new equipment. Particularly when they think it makes their jobs more difficult. Read more!
Brazil's elite goalkeeper (and how often have those words been written in the history of soccer?) hates the new ball to be used at South Africa 2010, by Fifa fiat.
How much he not like it?
Well, he said it looks like something "from a grocery store." He also called the ball "horrible" and "terrible." And suggested it was created to make life hard for those poor hard-working men in the nets, the goalkeepers.
Hmm.
Normally, almost nothing a Brazilian goalkeeper might say could be disregarded because Brazil's goalkeepers generally were second-rate and nondescript.
Julio Cesar, however, is different: He just backstopped Inter Milan to the Champions League championship. So he has some credibility.
If you would like to see a semi-scholarly (and Adidas-friendly) review of the ball, check here.
Apparently, the hope at Adidas was to create a ball that was ... oh, perfect. "True" in flight, with a higher ratio of kicking surface because of fewer seams ...
Here is a mugshot of the ball. On amazon.com which, of course, is attempting to sell you one.
And $122 ... on sale?!? No thanks.
I believe I would be quite happy with a soccer ball from, say ... the grocery store Julio Cesar shops at.
Anyway, look for more complaints about the new ball. Athletes never like new equipment. Particularly when they think it makes their jobs more difficult. Read more!
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Maybe This 'Soccer' Thing Is Catching On ...
The U.S. national soccer team had a "farewell and good luck" session with President Barack Obama today at the White House.
So maybe this "soccer" thing is catching on in the States, where "football" is a game played with a pointed ball and by very large men in helmets.
The significance?
That has never happened before, as far as my research indicates.
Bill Clinton was in the stands at Chicago in 1994 for the opening match, but it didn't involve the host nation -- it was Germany vs. Ecuador, as I recall.
In 2002, President George W. Bush called the U.S. team ahead of its second-round match with Mexico (a victory). In 2006, he called ahead of the opening match against the Czechs (a defeat).
And before Clinton, U.S. presidents couldn't be expected to know the national soccer team from any other 23 young guys rounded up off the streets. Soccer was an inconsequential sport. Didn't matter.
Grant Wahl of Sports Illustrated recaps some history of U.S. presidents and the World Cup, and it isn't a lengthy retelling. (Betcha $100 that President Herbert Hoover not only didn't know about the U.S. team at the 1930 World Cup ... he didn't know the World Cup existed.)
Obama reportedly told the players, "We're going to be proud of what you do in South Africa. And you will have somebody in the Oval Office watching ESPN to make sure things are going OK."
Rumors are that Obama will travel to South Africa if the Americans get out of Group C play.
OK, it wasn't a complete triumph ... Obama appears to have been doing a "meet the athletes" relay. Before chatting up the soccer lads, he congratulated the Duke University men's basketball team that won a national championship.
But, yeah. This soccer thing ... it may be at a tipping point. A bit of success this time around ...
American proponents of the game called soccer "the sports of the future" for so many years that critics responded by tweaking that statement with this: "Soccer is the sport of the future ... and always will be."
Actually, the future may finally be here, for the U.S. game. Read more!
So maybe this "soccer" thing is catching on in the States, where "football" is a game played with a pointed ball and by very large men in helmets.
The significance?
That has never happened before, as far as my research indicates.
Bill Clinton was in the stands at Chicago in 1994 for the opening match, but it didn't involve the host nation -- it was Germany vs. Ecuador, as I recall.
In 2002, President George W. Bush called the U.S. team ahead of its second-round match with Mexico (a victory). In 2006, he called ahead of the opening match against the Czechs (a defeat).
And before Clinton, U.S. presidents couldn't be expected to know the national soccer team from any other 23 young guys rounded up off the streets. Soccer was an inconsequential sport. Didn't matter.
Grant Wahl of Sports Illustrated recaps some history of U.S. presidents and the World Cup, and it isn't a lengthy retelling. (Betcha $100 that President Herbert Hoover not only didn't know about the U.S. team at the 1930 World Cup ... he didn't know the World Cup existed.)
Obama reportedly told the players, "We're going to be proud of what you do in South Africa. And you will have somebody in the Oval Office watching ESPN to make sure things are going OK."
Rumors are that Obama will travel to South Africa if the Americans get out of Group C play.
OK, it wasn't a complete triumph ... Obama appears to have been doing a "meet the athletes" relay. Before chatting up the soccer lads, he congratulated the Duke University men's basketball team that won a national championship.
But, yeah. This soccer thing ... it may be at a tipping point. A bit of success this time around ...
American proponents of the game called soccer "the sports of the future" for so many years that critics responded by tweaking that statement with this: "Soccer is the sport of the future ... and always will be."
Actually, the future may finally be here, for the U.S. game. Read more!
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Ox Sacrifice: Not Something You See Every Quadrennium
We stipulated long ago that South Africa 2010 would be like no other World Cup. For hundreds of reasons.
And here is one of them: The sacrifice of an ox at Soccer City to bless the country's World Cup stadiums, two weeks ahead of kickoff.
I am pretty sure Germany didn't sacrifice any large domestic animals at the 2006 World Cup ... and neither did Uruguay at the first World Cup, in 1930.
This is a South Africa thing.
According to the Johannesburg Times story linked above, a 70-year-old warrior of the Xhosa tribe did the honors, dispatching the beast with a spear thrust between the horns.
(Brings to mind the final thrust of a bullfight, actually. Maybe Spain did kill a bull or two, before the 1982 World Cup? But Italy won that one. Hmmm.)
The Times was told that the elderly warrior is "an expert in doing this" who was "brought all the way from the rural Eastern Cape" for the gig.
The story uses a couple of local-local words that I, at least, don't recognize, so I did some research.
A sangoma apparently is a "traditional healer" and sometimes simply referred to as a shaman.
Meanwhile, an inyanga seems to be more of a Zulu tribal concept, and according to the link is more into homeopathy than divination. And the inyanga apparently "learns from the living while the sangoma learns from the dead."
Hmm.
Doesn't hurt to have some around, presumably.
The ceremony included a blessing of "everything related to the World Cup." Does that extend to the author of this blog? Maybe not.
Let's see how South Africa 2010 turns out. Four years from now, Brazil may want to refer back to today's ox-slaughter/blessing-giving. Read more!
And here is one of them: The sacrifice of an ox at Soccer City to bless the country's World Cup stadiums, two weeks ahead of kickoff.
I am pretty sure Germany didn't sacrifice any large domestic animals at the 2006 World Cup ... and neither did Uruguay at the first World Cup, in 1930.
This is a South Africa thing.
According to the Johannesburg Times story linked above, a 70-year-old warrior of the Xhosa tribe did the honors, dispatching the beast with a spear thrust between the horns.
(Brings to mind the final thrust of a bullfight, actually. Maybe Spain did kill a bull or two, before the 1982 World Cup? But Italy won that one. Hmmm.)
The Times was told that the elderly warrior is "an expert in doing this" who was "brought all the way from the rural Eastern Cape" for the gig.
The story uses a couple of local-local words that I, at least, don't recognize, so I did some research.
A sangoma apparently is a "traditional healer" and sometimes simply referred to as a shaman.
Meanwhile, an inyanga seems to be more of a Zulu tribal concept, and according to the link is more into homeopathy than divination. And the inyanga apparently "learns from the living while the sangoma learns from the dead."
Hmm.
Doesn't hurt to have some around, presumably.
The ceremony included a blessing of "everything related to the World Cup." Does that extend to the author of this blog? Maybe not.
Let's see how South Africa 2010 turns out. Four years from now, Brazil may want to refer back to today's ox-slaughter/blessing-giving. Read more!
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Hey, Wait! Mexico Is Pretty Good
As a North American soccer fan, I can't help but smile at this.
A European journalist sees Mexico play and comes away saying, "Hey, those guys are pretty good."
Even after England defeated Mexico 3-1 at Wembley on Monday.
Such is the case of this story in the Johannesburg Times, where the individual supplying the copy for the newspaper decided, "Hmm, South African could be in trouble in that World Cup opener against Mexico 17 days from now."
Twas ever thus.
Euros tend to think the United States is decent is soccer, and it is. More or less. Wins a few, loses a few.
But Mexico seems to surprise the Euros -- and apparently the Africans, too -- every four years.
What about "five straight times in the second round" do people not get? (Leaving out the 1990 World Cup, when Mexico was banned for having used an overaged player.)
Quarterfinals in 1986, round of 16 in 1994, 1998, 2002, 2006.
El Tri, as Mexico is known (because Mexico's flag has three colors), is a serious opponent. They turn out cohesive, quick and technically advanced teams. They are expected to advance, and they expect if of themselves.
If you followed the link (above) to the game story, you will note that two of England's goals came in the air, in front of the net. And yes, size and playing in the air are the two biggest issues Mexico has. And they may not be issues at all against South Africa, also not a tall team.
The optimists in South Africa figured they would beat Mexico (how good can they be?) in the opener, then sneak past Uruguay and get into the second round out of Group A.
Then they say El Tri play.
The author of the Times story also points out how challenging Mexico's schedule in the run-up to South Africa 2010 is. After England at Wembley, they now get Netherlands in Freiburg, Gambia in Bayreuth and Italy in Brussels, giving them four matches in 11 days, three of them against top-eight-ranked teams in the world.
That's a Mexico thing, too: Play the best. And certainly coach Javier Aguirre is living it. When you play Italy and England and the Dutch, how easy will the Bafana Bafana Bafana seem?
Just makes me smile. This eternal surprise: "Hey, these Mexico dudes are pretty good."
Eventually, people other than gringos and ticos will remember this. Read more!
A European journalist sees Mexico play and comes away saying, "Hey, those guys are pretty good."
Even after England defeated Mexico 3-1 at Wembley on Monday.
Such is the case of this story in the Johannesburg Times, where the individual supplying the copy for the newspaper decided, "Hmm, South African could be in trouble in that World Cup opener against Mexico 17 days from now."
Twas ever thus.
Euros tend to think the United States is decent is soccer, and it is. More or less. Wins a few, loses a few.
But Mexico seems to surprise the Euros -- and apparently the Africans, too -- every four years.
What about "five straight times in the second round" do people not get? (Leaving out the 1990 World Cup, when Mexico was banned for having used an overaged player.)
Quarterfinals in 1986, round of 16 in 1994, 1998, 2002, 2006.
El Tri, as Mexico is known (because Mexico's flag has three colors), is a serious opponent. They turn out cohesive, quick and technically advanced teams. They are expected to advance, and they expect if of themselves.
If you followed the link (above) to the game story, you will note that two of England's goals came in the air, in front of the net. And yes, size and playing in the air are the two biggest issues Mexico has. And they may not be issues at all against South Africa, also not a tall team.
The optimists in South Africa figured they would beat Mexico (how good can they be?) in the opener, then sneak past Uruguay and get into the second round out of Group A.
Then they say El Tri play.
The author of the Times story also points out how challenging Mexico's schedule in the run-up to South Africa 2010 is. After England at Wembley, they now get Netherlands in Freiburg, Gambia in Bayreuth and Italy in Brussels, giving them four matches in 11 days, three of them against top-eight-ranked teams in the world.
That's a Mexico thing, too: Play the best. And certainly coach Javier Aguirre is living it. When you play Italy and England and the Dutch, how easy will the Bafana Bafana Bafana seem?
Just makes me smile. This eternal surprise: "Hey, these Mexico dudes are pretty good."
Eventually, people other than gringos and ticos will remember this. Read more!
Monday, May 24, 2010
Fill 'Er Up, and Where's the Museum?
These ideas always sound so inspired.
Hey, let's give a crash course on being a tourist guide to the guys who work at gas stations!
Which is what the city of Johannesburg is planning here in these final two weeks and change before South Africa 2010.
From the story linked above:
Employees at Sasol garages will be sent on a training course, and be able to provide helpful information on places of interest like Nelson Mandela’s former home in Soweto, or Constitution Hill in downtown Johannesburg, which celebrates South Africa’s new democracy.
"We are delighted to offer this industry-first, value-add service to our customers, both local and foreign, to ensure that they get the most out of their experience of the city of Johannesburg," Sasol Oil managing director Maurice Radebe said.
The Joburg Tourism company said the two-day training program will include different modules on tourism awareness, cultural diversity and a tour of all the tourist attractions in the city.
As we noted, a nice thought. But how practical is it?
Take if from a guy who pumped gas as a kid ... I knew where Broadway and Pine was ... but I probably couldn't tell you where civic luminaries in my town lived, back when I was a teenager checking oil and washing windows.
Maybe South Africa's pump jockeys know more about their hometown, and it's cultural epicenters ... but I'm not sure I would ask a guy at the BP where the nearest good Italian restaurant is. Or where Nelson Mandela lived, in Soweto.
More than anything this seems to be a sign of the country's enthusiasm (finally) for the event. To look at South Africa media these past few weeks is to get a sense of a country that is close to being "All World Cup all the time!"
As someone who has been watching South African media for the past year, I can say this: "It's about time people there got excited." Read more!
Hey, let's give a crash course on being a tourist guide to the guys who work at gas stations!
Which is what the city of Johannesburg is planning here in these final two weeks and change before South Africa 2010.
From the story linked above:
Employees at Sasol garages will be sent on a training course, and be able to provide helpful information on places of interest like Nelson Mandela’s former home in Soweto, or Constitution Hill in downtown Johannesburg, which celebrates South Africa’s new democracy.
"We are delighted to offer this industry-first, value-add service to our customers, both local and foreign, to ensure that they get the most out of their experience of the city of Johannesburg," Sasol Oil managing director Maurice Radebe said.
The Joburg Tourism company said the two-day training program will include different modules on tourism awareness, cultural diversity and a tour of all the tourist attractions in the city.
As we noted, a nice thought. But how practical is it?
Take if from a guy who pumped gas as a kid ... I knew where Broadway and Pine was ... but I probably couldn't tell you where civic luminaries in my town lived, back when I was a teenager checking oil and washing windows.
Maybe South Africa's pump jockeys know more about their hometown, and it's cultural epicenters ... but I'm not sure I would ask a guy at the BP where the nearest good Italian restaurant is. Or where Nelson Mandela lived, in Soweto.
More than anything this seems to be a sign of the country's enthusiasm (finally) for the event. To look at South Africa media these past few weeks is to get a sense of a country that is close to being "All World Cup all the time!"
As someone who has been watching South African media for the past year, I can say this: "It's about time people there got excited." Read more!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
